Nausea and vomiting are common experiences in pregnancy and it is considered as a part of normal physiology. It affects about 75% of pregnant women without a known cause. In most cases, it is a mild and self-limited condition that can be controlled with conservative measures and has no adverse fetal outcomes. Women with severe nausea and vomiting during pregnancy (NVP) may have hyperemesis gravidarum (HG); an entity distinct from NVP, which if left untreated may lead to significant maternal and fetal morbidity. The objective of this study was to assess the presence and severity of anxiety in pregnant women with and without HG. The study is a case-control study on 52 pregnant women divided into two groups: cases hospitalized with the diagnosis of HG and healthy pregnant women as a control group. All mothers in the study were evaluated by Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) and General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-28). It was revealed that most of hyperemesis gravidarum cases suffered from severe anxiety while only (7.7%) of healthy control had severe anxiety, with high statistical significant difference. The mean of Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) is statistically higher among hyperemesis gravidarum cases than healthy controls. Regarding General Health Questionnaire - 28 subscales; the mean score of somatic symptoms, social dysfunction and severe depression is statistically higher among hyperemesis gravidarum cases than healthy controls. It was concluded that anxiety and emotional distress were more common and severe in patients with HG.
Published in | Journal of Family Medicine and Health Care (Volume 5, Issue 4) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.jfmhc.20190504.14 |
Page(s) | 59-63 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2019. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Hyperemesis Gravidarum‚ Anxiety, Emotional Distress
[1] | London V, Grube S, Sherer D and Abulafia O. Hyperemesis Gravidarum: A Review of recent literature. Pharmacology. 2017; 100 (3-4): 161-171. doi: 10.1159/000477853. |
[2] | AAFP. Nausea and Vomiting of Pregnancy. Am Fam Physician. 2014; 15. 89 (12): 965-970. https://www.aafp.org/afp/2014/0615/p965.html. |
[3] | Nurmi M, Rautava P, Gissler M, Vahlberg T and Polo-Kantola P. Recurrence patterns of hyperemesis gravidarum. Am J. Obstet Gynecol. 2018; 219: 5 (469. e1–469. e10). |
[4] | Yeh C, Tsui K and Wang P. Hyperemesis gravidarum. J Chin Med Assoc. 2018; 81 (9): 755-756. doi: 10.1016/j.jcma.2017.09.001. |
[5] | Sykes C, Swallow B, Gadsby R, Barnie-Adshead A, Dean C, Moran E, et al. Seeking medical help for Nausea and Vomiting in Pregnancy (NVP) and Hyperemesis Gravidarum (HG) in primary care. MIDIRS. 2013; 9: 13–15. |
[6] | Dean C and Marsden J. Women’s experiences of treatment for hyperemesis gravidarum in day case settings compared to hospital admissions. MIDIRS Midwifery Digest. 2017; 27 (2); 177–86. |
[7] | Mitchell-Jones N, Gallos I, Farren J, Tobias A, Bottomley C and Bourne T. Psychological morbidity associated with hyperemesis gravidarum; a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG. 2017; 124 (1): 20-30. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14180. |
[8] | Kjeldgaard H, Eberhard-Gran M, Benth J and Vikanes A. Hyperemesis gravidarum and the risk of emotional distress during and after pregnancy. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2017; 20 (6): 747–756. doi: 10.1007/s00737-017-0770-5. |
[9] | Balık G, Tekin Y and Kağıtcı M. Is there relationship between social support, psychological distress, mood disorders and hyperemesis gravidarum?. Journal of Obstetrics Gynaecology. 2015; 35 (7): 737–40. |
[10] | Groleau D, Benady-Chorney J, Panaitoiu A and Jimenez V. Hyperemesis Gravidarum in the context of migration: when the absence of cultural meaning gives rise to “blaming the victim”. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2019; 19, 197. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2344-1 |
[11] | Kender E, Yukse G, Ger C and Ozer U. Eating attitudes, depression and anxiety levels of patients with hyperemesis gravidarum hospitalized in an obstetrics and gynecology clinic. The Journal of Psychiatry and Neurological Sciences. 2015; 28 (119-126). doi: 10.5350/DAJPN2015280204. |
[12] | Hamilton M. The assessment of anxiety states by rating. Br J Med Psychol 1959; (32): 50–55. https://dcf.psychiatry.ufl.edu/files/2011/05/Hamilton-Anxiety.pdf. |
[13] | Goldberg D. Manual of the General Health Questionnaire. NFER-Nelson, Windsor (1978). |
[14] | Robinson R and Price T. Post-Stroke depressive disorders: A follow-up study of 103 patients of stroke. Stroke. 1982; 13 (5): 635-41. |
[15] | Failde I, Ramos I and Fernandez-Palacín F. Comparison between the GHQ-28 and SF-36 (MH 1-5) for the assessment of the mental health in patients with ischaemic heart disease. Eur J Epidemiol. 2000; 16 (4): 311-6. |
[16] | Senturk M, Turan K, Cakmak Y and Budak M. Hyperemesis gravidarum, socio-cultural factors and maternal short psychiatric status. Medical Science and Discovery. 2015; 2 (6): 323-7. doi: 10.17546/msd.59756. |
[17] | Annagür B, Kerimoğlu Ö, Gündüz Ş and Tazegül A. Are there any differences in psychiatric symptoms and eating attitudes between pregnant women with hyperemesis gravidarum and healthy pregnant women?: J. Obstet. Gynaecol.2014 ;40 (4): 1009–1014 doi: 10.1111/jog.12274. |
[18] | Şimşek Y, Çelik Ö, Yılmaz E, Karaer A, Yıldırım E and Yoloğlu S. Assessment of anxiety and depression levels of pregnant women with hyperemesis gravidarum in a case-control study. Journal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association. 2012; 13 (1): 32-36. doi: 10.5152/jtgga.2012.01. |
[19] | Kender E, Yuksel G, Ger C and Ozer U. Eating attitudes, depression and anxiety levels of patients with hyperemesis gravidarum hospitalized in an obstetrics and gynecology clinic. The Journal of Psychiatry and Neurological Sciences.2015; 28 (2): (119–126). doi: 10.5350/DAJPN2015280204. |
[20] | Ezberci I, Güven E, Ustüner I, Sahin F and Hocaoğlu C. Disability and psychiatric symptoms in hyperemesis gravidarum patients. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014; 289 (1): 55-60. doi: 10.1007/s00404-013-2934-5. |
[21] | Beyazit F and Sahin B. Effect of nausea and vomiting on anxiety and depression levels in early pregnancy. Eurasian J Med. 2018; 50 (2): (111-115). doi: 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2018.170320. |
[22] | Topalahmetoğlu Y, Altay M, Cırık D, Tohma Y, Çolak E and Çoşkun B. et al. Depression and anxiety disorder in hyperemesis gravidarum: A prospective case-control study. Turkish Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2017; 14 (4): (214–219). http://doi.org/10.4274/tjod.78477. |
[23] | Pirimoglu Z, Guzelmeric K, Alpay B, Balcik O, Unal O and Turan M. Psychological factors of hyperemesis gravidarum by using the SCL-90-R questionnaire. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2010; (37): 56–59. |
APA Style
Nora Nabil Hussien, Aya Ahmed El Masry, Moustafa Mohammed Zaitoun, Eman Roshdy Alsafi. (2019). Anxiety and Emotional Distress in Hyperemesis Gravidarum Patients (A Case-Control Study) in Zagazig University Hospitals, Egypt. Journal of Family Medicine and Health Care, 5(4), 59-63. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jfmhc.20190504.14
ACS Style
Nora Nabil Hussien; Aya Ahmed El Masry; Moustafa Mohammed Zaitoun; Eman Roshdy Alsafi. Anxiety and Emotional Distress in Hyperemesis Gravidarum Patients (A Case-Control Study) in Zagazig University Hospitals, Egypt. J. Fam. Med. Health Care 2019, 5(4), 59-63. doi: 10.11648/j.jfmhc.20190504.14
AMA Style
Nora Nabil Hussien, Aya Ahmed El Masry, Moustafa Mohammed Zaitoun, Eman Roshdy Alsafi. Anxiety and Emotional Distress in Hyperemesis Gravidarum Patients (A Case-Control Study) in Zagazig University Hospitals, Egypt. J Fam Med Health Care. 2019;5(4):59-63. doi: 10.11648/j.jfmhc.20190504.14
@article{10.11648/j.jfmhc.20190504.14, author = {Nora Nabil Hussien and Aya Ahmed El Masry and Moustafa Mohammed Zaitoun and Eman Roshdy Alsafi}, title = {Anxiety and Emotional Distress in Hyperemesis Gravidarum Patients (A Case-Control Study) in Zagazig University Hospitals, Egypt}, journal = {Journal of Family Medicine and Health Care}, volume = {5}, number = {4}, pages = {59-63}, doi = {10.11648/j.jfmhc.20190504.14}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jfmhc.20190504.14}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jfmhc.20190504.14}, abstract = {Nausea and vomiting are common experiences in pregnancy and it is considered as a part of normal physiology. It affects about 75% of pregnant women without a known cause. In most cases, it is a mild and self-limited condition that can be controlled with conservative measures and has no adverse fetal outcomes. Women with severe nausea and vomiting during pregnancy (NVP) may have hyperemesis gravidarum (HG); an entity distinct from NVP, which if left untreated may lead to significant maternal and fetal morbidity. The objective of this study was to assess the presence and severity of anxiety in pregnant women with and without HG. The study is a case-control study on 52 pregnant women divided into two groups: cases hospitalized with the diagnosis of HG and healthy pregnant women as a control group. All mothers in the study were evaluated by Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) and General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-28). It was revealed that most of hyperemesis gravidarum cases suffered from severe anxiety while only (7.7%) of healthy control had severe anxiety, with high statistical significant difference. The mean of Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) is statistically higher among hyperemesis gravidarum cases than healthy controls. Regarding General Health Questionnaire - 28 subscales; the mean score of somatic symptoms, social dysfunction and severe depression is statistically higher among hyperemesis gravidarum cases than healthy controls. It was concluded that anxiety and emotional distress were more common and severe in patients with HG.}, year = {2019} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Anxiety and Emotional Distress in Hyperemesis Gravidarum Patients (A Case-Control Study) in Zagazig University Hospitals, Egypt AU - Nora Nabil Hussien AU - Aya Ahmed El Masry AU - Moustafa Mohammed Zaitoun AU - Eman Roshdy Alsafi Y1 - 2019/11/25 PY - 2019 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jfmhc.20190504.14 DO - 10.11648/j.jfmhc.20190504.14 T2 - Journal of Family Medicine and Health Care JF - Journal of Family Medicine and Health Care JO - Journal of Family Medicine and Health Care SP - 59 EP - 63 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2469-8342 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jfmhc.20190504.14 AB - Nausea and vomiting are common experiences in pregnancy and it is considered as a part of normal physiology. It affects about 75% of pregnant women without a known cause. In most cases, it is a mild and self-limited condition that can be controlled with conservative measures and has no adverse fetal outcomes. Women with severe nausea and vomiting during pregnancy (NVP) may have hyperemesis gravidarum (HG); an entity distinct from NVP, which if left untreated may lead to significant maternal and fetal morbidity. The objective of this study was to assess the presence and severity of anxiety in pregnant women with and without HG. The study is a case-control study on 52 pregnant women divided into two groups: cases hospitalized with the diagnosis of HG and healthy pregnant women as a control group. All mothers in the study were evaluated by Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) and General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-28). It was revealed that most of hyperemesis gravidarum cases suffered from severe anxiety while only (7.7%) of healthy control had severe anxiety, with high statistical significant difference. The mean of Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) is statistically higher among hyperemesis gravidarum cases than healthy controls. Regarding General Health Questionnaire - 28 subscales; the mean score of somatic symptoms, social dysfunction and severe depression is statistically higher among hyperemesis gravidarum cases than healthy controls. It was concluded that anxiety and emotional distress were more common and severe in patients with HG. VL - 5 IS - 4 ER -